Basics of an Exegetical Paper
A exegetical paper is an essay, not a report. A report is a presentation of information gleaned from research, whereas an essay is a reasoned investigation that makes definite assertions and supports and defends those assertions. Some marks of a good paper are: clarity of expression, rigor in argumentation, correctness in form, balance in judgment, fairness in handling opposing views, breadth of coverage, discipline in focus, and plausibility of conclusions in light of all the relevant evidence.
The exegetical paper follows standard academic writing procedures (this does not mean it must be boring). This means that the paper is written in your own words, with proper credit given when quoting or referring to words or ideas from another person. The paper should also be written in good English, which includes proper spelling and grammar as well as prose that is free from informal English (slang, appeals to the reader, contractions, etc.). The text should be clear, coherent, and as concise as possible—wordiness does not equal scholarliness.
Elements of Exegesis
This section seeks to lay out the process of writing an exegetical paper, not the exegetical method itself. For a discussion of how to do exegesis, or the questions to ask in exegesis, see either your professor or one of the many good books explaining the process, such as these:
The writing of an exegetical paper typically entails the following phases:
- Preparation – choose a text.
- Exegesis – Explore and interact with the text itself. This stage involves your interaction with the text, not with secondary sources (e.g., commentaries, articles, etc.). Observe before interpreting and responding. Always let the text speak to you as you prayerfully yield to it.
- Research – Explore secondary sources on your text. Create and explore your bibliography of sources – reference works (Bible dictionaries, theological dictionaries, etc.), commentaries, articles, essays from collected volumes (polygraphs), other books that deal with your passage, genre, form, or topics raised by the passage and identified in your exegesis.
- Consolidation – Correct, refine, and confirm your exegesis based upon your research. Finalize your thoughts, claims, and conclusions regarding the passage. Develop the outline for your paper as the final step of consolidation – bring your thoughts to paper and begin to think about how it all fits together.
- Writing – Write your paper following all the steps of good writing. Make sure to leave time to edit your paper and to have someone else (e.g., your professor, your committee chairman, the Scribe: Covenant’s resource center for theological writing) look at it.
Outline of an Exegetical Paper
The typical exegetical paper is comprised of the following five sections:
- Introduction – The introduction of an exegetical paper serves the same purpose as all introductions and yet has some features that are unique to this genre. In addition to the general introduction (giving the text being studied, thesis, etc.) the introduction of an exegetical paper must also introduce the text. Components often included are:
- Literal translation
- Literary context and flow of thought
- Literary genre – of both the larger text of which the passage is a part and the passage itself
- Literary forms – found within the passage
- Structure of passage
- Commentary – This is the verse-by-verse comments upon the passage. Constantly ask is this observation relevant for interpretation and explanation—it is not necessary to comment upon everything in a passage. Components often included are:
- Grammar and syntax
- Semantic analysis
- Socio-historical background
- Motif-historical background (e.g., OT themes, other influences)
- Literary analysis and figures of speech
- Interpretation – This section returns to the passage as a whole and seeks to interpret the passage in light of the information given in the preceding sections of the paper. It is here that meaning is given to the information previously presented, including:
- Main theme/key thought
- Theological significance
- Conclusion – In the conclusion, tie all of the information presented together and return to the thesis presented in the introduction.
- Bibliography – Lastly, list all of the sources that you cited in your paper.
Format of an Exegetical Paper
Unless your professor requests otherwise, the following conventions are recommended.
- The paper should be typed and double-spaced using a clear, non-ornamental, serif font. Examples of acceptable fonts include Times New Roman or Palatino. The text of the paper should be set in 12-point type with footnotes in 10-point.
- Margins are typically 1″ on all sides.
- Page numbers should be included on all pages in a place that remains consistent throughout the paper (i.e., top right on every page, bottom center on every page, etc.).
- Only one space (not two) should be placed after the terminal punctuation of a sentence.
- Titles of books and other longer works should be italicized, not underlined. Titles of articles, essays, parts of longer works, or other shorter works should be enclosed in quotation marks.
Exegesis is a word for the systematic process by which a person arrives at a reasonable and coherent sense of the meaning and message of a biblical passage. A good exegete has learned what questions to ask of a text in order to arrive at this sense and how to find the answers. Because the right kind of questions will vary depending on the type of literature involved, and finding them is more of an art than a science, a guide such as this is not definitive, but only a crude tool.
The goal of an exegetical paper is coherently, succinctly and sensitively to open-up the meaning of the text in such a way that it reflects the particularities (e.g. "feel", plain sense, problems, ambiguities, context, potential theological sensus plenior, etc.) of that text alone. The reader of the paper should be left with the impression not that the student has done something new or different with the text but has understood it well, including mirroring such things as its aesthetics (or lack thereof) and problems.
Mode of Inquiry
What you're after is the text's meaning, not your own, so go slowly. By asking the text questions, let it tell you what it means. The correct method is not mystical or devotional, but careful and methodical. You are looking for meaning and coherence that really is there. To use an analogy, the text is the lead partner in a dance of meaning; your job is to follow, observe and interpret the dance with sensitivity and precision.
The nature of the object must always determine the mode of inquiry. In the case of the Bible the mode of inquiry must reflect the fact that it is both the Word of God and the word of people. In view of the Bible's character as divine revelation, the exegete should approach the text with a conviction about its implicit sensibility and with a sense of humility, tenacity, faith and, above all, reverence. Because the Bible is also the word of people, the mode of inquiry must also include the same methods that are used to understand other kinds of literature.
Begin (and proceed) with prayer, asking God for wisdom and insight.
2. Identify a Meaningful Unit
Compare several English translations to ensure that you are exegeting a meaning unit such as a complete paragraph. In general, the paragraph divisions in the UBS Greek New Testament or the New International Version or New Revised Standard Version are reliable guides.
3. Study the Passage
Look in several translations for differences over what words, phrases or even verses are included as part of the 'original' text. Where differences exist consult the critical apparatus (if you know Greek and/or Hebrew) or modern in-depth commentaries such as the Word [BS 491.2 W67] or Hermeneia series.
Subtle differences in wording should be overlooked; the concerns here are obvious such as totally different wording and missing/extra phrases, etc. Normally the problems will be few and the variations minor. For the New Testament, a good resource is Bruce Metzger, A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament (United Bible Society, 1978).
To orient yourself briefly to the passage use secondary sources to determine only the date, historical background, and (in some detail) the purpose and message of the entire section in which the passage is found. (This might be the book itself or it might be several books such as the Pentateuch or both.)
- In what sort of literature does your section occur?
- How does the literary form of the book and your section affect your understanding of the passage?
Don't look yet at what the secondary sources state specifically about your particular unit. This will prematurely channel your own thinking about the passage and block important insights.
Using a photocopy or printout of the passage in context and different colored pencils, charts, and diagrams, highlight the presence of such things as contrasts, similarities, repetition of key words or phrases, development in argumentation, etc. both within your unit and between the several units that precede and follow your unit. Write out the unit itself in a way that outlines its grammar, syntax and structure. Ponder both what is and what surprisingly isn't in the unit (and context) and the possible significance of what you find odd or baffling. Use your analysis to assess the purpose and message of your unit in relation to the preceding and following units, and, importantly, in relation also to the purpose and message of the broader context that you noted in B above.
A good resource that exemplifies the method advocated here is Oletta Wald, The New Joy of Discovery in Bible Study. (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 2002). [BS 600.2 W28].
Analysis of the Argument
As much as possible, move beyond what the passage is stating (and how) to an assessment of why it is stating it and even to why it is stating it at this particular place within the overall 'argument' of the broader section.
- What significance would the argument of your unit have had for its original hearers?
Your analysis should at least come close to being able to answer these kinds of questions. If not, you should probably read more about the historical background, purpose and theological message of the broader unit and re-examine the text within its broader context. It is true that even for the Psalms you should be looking at your unit as one would a single frame in a movie; it has a role to play within its broader context which constitutes a story or argument. To find its meaning, relate the frame to the sequence in which it is found.
Consult Secondary Sources
Consult several reputable modern commentaries. Older works (e.g. Calvin, Luther, 17th-19th century commentators) should not be ignored, particularly for theological insight on the text. Use your work in steps C and D to assess the value of the exegetical and theological insights offered and use the insights offered in the commentaries as a stimulus for your own reflection and further research (see step F below). As necessary, consult lexicons for the meaning of words, Bible atlases for geographical points of reference, Bible dictionaries for entries on relevant topics or issues, etc.
Be sure to adjudicate (and, in light of this, glean) all significant insights that you might have missed in your own analysis or any significant debates that contribute to or affect an understanding of the text and its message.
As a general rule a "reputable modern" commentary will have been published within the past 30 years and will most likely be from one of the following publishers (in addition to a university press): Abingdon, Augsburg (and/or Fortress), Baker, Brazos, T & T Clark, Continuum, Doubleday, Hendrickson, Eerdmans, Michael Glazier, The Pontifical Institute, Westminster (and/or John Knox), IVP, Word, and Zondervan.
Selected Further Research
Using your best judgment, decide what two or three outstanding questions will likely contribute the most to your understanding of the particular unit. Conduct the research necessary to answer these questions.
Write the Exegetical Paper
- The previous steps related to studying the passage should not be rehearsed or included in their entirety. Rather, the research conducted above should be integrated in such a way that the text is opened up with freshness and sensitivity to its various dimensions (including role in context and even points of ambiguity). The essay should be a presentation of conclusions (though with clear and sufficient support) arrived at in the previous stages. It should clearly move beyond historical background and literary features to the theological meaning of the passage, but should not become a sermon.
- The exegetical paper should include at least brief consideration of hermeneutical aspects.
- What theological questions of contemporary relevance are raised by the passage?
- How does the passage resonate with other portions of Scripture and with the Gospel itself?
- The method of citing footnotes and bibliography should be consistent and should conform to The SBL Handbook of Style (Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, 1999) [PN 147. S26] or a similar standard reference work such as K. Turabian, Wayne C. Booth & Gregory C. Colomb A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations: Chicago Style for Students and Researchers, 7th ed. (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 2007). [LB2369 .T8 2007].
- Where a word study is required as part of the exegetical exercise, the word chosen should be key and a standard "how to" guide on doing a word study followed.
The Rev. Dr. Glen Taylor
Revised, Nov. 2012.