Persuasive Essay About Animals Rights

In the article “Why Animals Deserve Legal Rights”, Author Steven M. Wise argues in favor of animal rights based on the premise that all animals are autonomous. Furthermore he states that the term ‘rights’ has been widely debated and is arguably not affordable to all humans. Wise research indicates that rights are widely believed to be based on autonomy. And Wise does not believe we have an accurate grasp on the term ‘autonomy’. He shows that evidence does not illustrate all humans as ‘autonomous’. Steven Wise cites evidence that Animals are indeed autonomous in at least some cases. He includes and example of a gorilla who displays more cognitive skill than a two year old human. Wise shows distaste for the ancient and presiding understanding of animals as “things, nonhuman animals have been invisible to civil law since its inception.” (Spatt 195) He cites Roman jurist Hermogenianus as saying, “All law, was established for men’s sake.” (Spatt 195)

He displays a disagreement when he notes, “Unfortunately for animals, many people have believed that they were put on earth for human use and lack autonomy.” (Spatt 195) Wise also illustrates a few of the foolish laws we have done away with as our wisdom has increased. Wise argues, “Once the law assumed that witches existed and that mute people lacked intelligence. Now it is illegal to burn someone for witchcraft, and the mute have the same rights as anyone else.”(Spatt 196) Wise believes we should change the laws based on our new scientific findings regarding animals. Wise infers that if not all humans can be granted rights, that rights should not be granted to only humans, but to a more broad audience based on a new criteria. Wise feels that animals are as autonomous as humans, and should be granted the rights of such a being. Wise seems to be motivated by compassion, and a righteous anger toward the mistreatment of animals. This is understandable. He wants people to see them as more than just tools, toys, or food. He seems to imply that animals are conscious and autonomous. He believes our new era of scientific understanding should facilitate a different legal perspective on animals.

I sympathize with Stephen Wise’s concern for animals, however it is simply not practical to direct the same amount of attention to animals as humans. If we gave animals human rights, it seems we would no longer be able eat them. This would create a famine and/or all out social rebellion. Animal research is also leading us to new new medical understandings that are crucial. At what cost do we stop all animal research? Even if that were not the case, would killing an animal count as murder? I’m not sure that Wise intended this degree of severity. However, to say that a human can not hunt for food is to take away a crucial aspect of our development as humans. This is how we survive. But if we look at many Native American practices, we will find that they respect and honor the spirit of each animal. I feel this is appropriate. I also feel it is inappropriate to stuff animals into a warehouse to live. This is fueled by greed. But we can not stop every injustice, and we must eat. Human beings are ultimately fragile. They must eat and drink water each day. Giving animals human rights in unpractical.

However we should, and do in many cases, treat animals fairly and with respect. It almost feels as if Stephen Wise forgot that we DO indeed have laws in many countries that protect animals. We have enforcement agents all over the country that protect our animalss. The inability to feel compassion for animals I believe is an inadequacy in the empathy department, but we also can not obsess over our anguish for animals. In the wild there is cruelty all day, and every day. It has been the pattern since animals first took a breath and got hungry. The animal world is a beautiful yet brutal place. We as humans exist there as well. Although some of us remain relatively unaware of this reality.

The argument that human rights don’t even apply to all humans, supports the debate that animals do not necessarily deserve human rights. (Spatt 195) Humans that throw feces and hurt other human beings are not given rights, they are locked up and stripped of rights. Animals can arguably fall into this category. Animals can not enter into our dialogue of language to make the commitments that humans make when they become part of a society. Meaning that when you are in a society, you are expected to behave a certain way. If you do not you have broken this social contract and are not given rights by other people. Animals are incapable of understanding this, and therefore can not enter our contract which allows one rights.

Works Cited

Spatt, Brenda. Writing from Sources 8th Ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin, 2011.
106-145, 183-217. Print

+ All Animal Rights Essays:

  • The Horror that is Animal Testing
  • Are we teaching the right things, to the right people, in the right way?
  • Against Animal Testing
  • Factory Farming and Animal Cruelty
  • Use of Animals for Research
  • Animal Testing in Cosmetics
  • No More Hunting Animals
  • Humans And Animals Relationships
  • Where Are Women's Rights?
  • Symbolism in Animal Farm
  • Owning Exotic Animals, Is It Ethical?
  • We Need to Get Rid of Animal Testing
  • Animal Cruelty: Dog Fighting
  • Aboriginal Land Rights
  • Animal Hoarding
  • Animal Testing Is Wrong
  • Animals and Its Beneficial Uses to Man
  • Animals Take Over in Animal Farm by George Orwell
  • No-Kill Shelters Rehabilitation for Animals
  • Animal Dilemma
  • The Environment and Its Rights
  • Right to Counsel
  • Stop Animal Cruelty
  • Animal Testing - Necessary or Barbaric and Wrong? - Discursive Essay.
  • Poor Treatment of Circus Animals
  • Animal Farm by George Orwell
  • Relationship between Animals and Humans
  • The Lowest Animal by Mark Twain
  • Animal Liberation
  • Animal Rights, Human Wrongs vs. The Damned Human Race
  • Animal Farm, 1984
  • Animal Testing is Wrong
  • Animal Testing Persuasive Essay
  • Adoption of Animals
  • Hero Of Animal Farm
  • The Necessities of Animal Experimentation
  • Animal Experimentation Pros and Cons
  • Animal Farm by George Orwell
  • Should Animals Be Kept in the Zoo?
  • The Cons of Animal Testing
  • An Inside Look at Animal Experimentation
  • George Washington - the Right Leader at the Right Time
  • Animal Testing is Vital to Medical Advances
  • Argument for Stopping Animal Abuse
  • George Orwell's Animal Farm
  • Animal Farm by George Orwell
  • Animal Testing
  • The Cruelty of Animal Testing
  • Animal Testing Ethics
  • Animal Testing is Wrong!
  • Animal Cruelty - Essay 7
  • Cosmetics Testing on Animals, Is It Necessary?
  • Killing an Animal for Clothing
  • Totalitarian Government in Animal Farm
  • Spay And Neuter your Animals
  • Marine Animals: The Manatee
  • Limitation on Animal Testing
  • Animals vs. Humans in Medical Experimentation
  • Animal Shelters and the No Kill Movement
  • Animal Testing Should Be Banned
  • Do Animals Have A Say?: Comparative Analysis of Animal Rights, Human Wrongs and Proud to be Speciecist
  • Do Animals Have Language?
  • Animals and Humans Are Not Equal
  • Genetic Engineering: Rights and Responsibilities
  • Property Rights and the Economic System
  • Animal Abuse
  • Analysis of Animal Treatment in Circus
  • Animal Cruelty on Factory Farms
  • Peter Singer's Views on the Killing of Animals
  • Animal Farm And The Russian Revolution
  • Euthanasia: Your Right
  • Essay on Animal Imagery in A Doll's House
  • The Ethics of Animal Use in Biomedical Research
  • The Ethical Treatment of Animals
  • The Controversy of Testing on Animals
  • Bill of Rights & Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen
  • A Brief History of Animal Abuse and Cruelty
  • Animal Testing and Researching
  • Animal Experimentation
  • Animal Testing
  • Animal Farm by George Orwell
  • Animal Farm by George Orwell
  • The Unethical Treatment of Animals
  • Animal Farm Research Paper
  • Plant And Animal Cells
  • Black Civil Rights and Feminist Rights
  • Serving the Public and the Animals
  • Gay Rights: Homosexuals Deserve the same Rights as Heterosexuals
  • Animal Cruelty
  • Animal Testing: a Cruel and Inhumane Way
  • Animal Testing: Pros and Cons
  • Women's Rights Are Human Rights by Hilary Clinton
  • Analysis on Gary Steiner´s Animal, Vegetable, Miserable
  • Should Animals Be Kept in Zoos?

0 comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *